पठन अभ्यास

The philosopher's argument, though rigorously constructed, rests on a premise few outside academic circles would readily grant: that rational agents, given perfect information, would necessarily converge on identical moral conclusions. Real-world moral disagreement, on this view, is explained away as a symptom of imperfect information rather than treated as potential evidence of genuinely divergent, and perhaps irreducible, values — a move that strikes many readers as begging the very question it purports to resolve.